The framework agreement and timetable define the reasons why one party may impose the closure of covered transactions due to the appearance of a termination event by the other party. Standard termination events include defaults or bankruptcy. Other closing events that can be added to the calendar include a downgrade of credit data below a specified level. The isda masteragrement is a framework agreement that defines the terms and conditions between parties wishing to trade over-the-counter derivatives. There are two main versions that are still widely used on the market: the 1992 ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency – Cross Border) and the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement. An ISDA master contract is the standard document that is regularly used to regulate over-the-counter derivatives transactions. The agreement, published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), outlines the conditions to be applied to a derivatives transaction between two parties, usually to a derivatives trader and counterparty. The master contract of the ISDA itself is the norm, but it is accompanied by a bespoke timetable and sometimes an annex to support the credit, both signed by both parties in a given transaction. The 1998 definitions of foreign exchange and exchange options are published jointly by ISDA, EMTA and the Foreign Exchange Committee and are intended to confirm certain transactions governed by (i) the 1992 ISDA Executive Contracts; (ii) the International Foreign Exchange and Options Master Agreement (“FEOMA”), the International Foreign Exchange Master Agreement (IFEMA) and the International Agreement on Market Options (ICOM), published by the Currency Committee in collaboration with the British Bankers Association, the Canadian Foreign Exchange Committee and the Tokyo Foreign Exchange Market Practices Committee; and (iii) other similar agreements.
The most important thing is to remember that the ISDA executive contract is a clearing agreement and that all transactions are interdependent. Therefore, a default in a transaction counts by default among all transactions. Point 1 (c) describes the concept of a single agreement and is of paramount importance as it forms the basis for network closures. When a standard event occurs, all transactions are completed without exception. The concept of out-of-gap clearing prevents a liquidator from making “cherry pickings,” i.e. making payments on profitable transactions for his bankrupt client and refusing to do so in the case of an unprofitable customer.